Ashley Dawson Transcript
Okay thank you so much Ashley, for being here with us today. We’re honored to have you. Ashley Dawson is a writer and climate justice activist based in New York. Ashley is professor of English at the Graduate Center, City University of New York and at the College of Staten Island. He is the author of four books covering an impressive range of subjects, extreme cities: the peril and promise of urban life in the age of climate change, published by Verso in 2017. extinction: a radical history published by OR books in 2016. the Routledge Concise history of 20th century British literature in 2013 and Mongrel nation: diasporic culture in the making of postcolonial Britain in 2007. Ashley Dawson is also the founder of the climate action lab at the graduate center. Ashley, I’ll start by asking you about your work. Your work brings together two fields, environmental humanities and postcolonial studies. So conventionally one begins with nature or the environment. And the second, uh, begins with culture or the humanright.
Could you tell us a little bit about how you’re thinking about those two fields? What’s the relation between the two?
Ashley Dawson: (01:24)
Of course. Yeah. Um, well, I mean, I can tell a specific story about traveling to Staten Island after Hurricane Sandy hit and finding that power was out on the campus of Cuny and that many of my students were pretty devastated. Some of them had lost their homes and some of the students at college of Staten Island had actually lost their lives. So, um, seeing the ways in which the natural disaster played out in an uneven manner across the different geographies of New York City. Um, I was traveling from a neighborhood in Queens that was hardly impacted at all and knew people who were activists who are going into parts of Brooklyn that were really terribly affected. Um, and then seeing what was happening on Staten Island, it was very apparent that cities are uneven and unequal geographies and that they are dramatically impacted by hurricanes and other natural disasters in a way that magnifies those inequalities.
Ashley Dawson: (02:35)
And so that point about the unevenness of urban terrain and the inequalities that play out in the face of disasters is true not just on an urban scale, but of course on a global scale. Right? So the horrible irony that formerly colonized countries are the least responsible for carbon emissions in aggregate, um, and yeayh, are the places that are being most severely impacted right now by climate change, um, is something that I think has to be thought about in terms of the kind of confluence of these two fields. Postcolonial studies and environmental humanities. We really can’t understand the way in which the climate catastrophe is playing out without understanding the historical residues and contemporary instantiations of colonial power and imperialism
I was, you know, I was actually trying to figure out where that question was leading me to, which is a question of scale. MMM. So what the postcolonial, and I think what the environmental, uh, does is it invites us to think across multiple scales. Climate change somehow demands a planetary scale, but we live in more intimate than human scales, as you said, but also global connections make cities extremely vulnerable. the term you use is, um, we have “cascading climate disruptions.” Can you say more about cascades, which I think is a really useful way of thinking across scales, right? So while you focus on cities like New York, Jakarta, Miami, Rotterdam, New Orleans, it’s clear that it’s somehow impossible to think of a city or any one group on its own. Um, so there’s no single island basically, and you write, that catastrophe is not unfolding in the global south only. Or in Queens only. Right? Everything is connected. So could you talk about these, you know, this term cascading climate disruptions?
Ashley Dawson: (04:46)
Sure. Absolutely. Um, so perhaps one good place to start is with the city of New Orleans, um, which of course we know is a site of disaster from Hurricane Katrina. But what people might not be so familiar with is that after the Army Corps of engineers fixed the levees, the city still remains extremely imperiled by climate change. Um, and there are variety of different reasons for that and they show the ways in which we can’t think of any particular geographical site in isolation. You know, we need, as you said, to sort of be able to toggle up and down scales and to think about ecosystems in their holistic relation to one another and, uh, to think across geographical spaces. So the city of New Orleans is highly exposed to hurricanes coming in off the Gulf because of the fact that the marshland south of the city is subsiding. Why is it subsiding?
Ashley Dawson: (05:49)
Well, there are a variety of different reasons. One of the primary reasons is that the mighty Mississippi River has been enclosed by levees and other forms of flood control. Um, principally since 1927 when there was a disastrous breach in the existing levies, um, which was connected to the great migration north of, um, African Americans, but going back much longer, uh, to the beginning of the history of colonialism with the French in Louisiana. Right? So taking a terrain which was constantly changing, you know, with the Mississippi River shifting around. And as it shifted, it would deposit sediment in different areas and build up the, the Lobes, which are now that kind of boot like structure, which is Louisiana, um, including New Orleans and the areas south of it. Uh, so as the kind of colonial enterprise of taking the river and nature more broadly and kind of controlling it and putting it within this tourniquet structure of the levees ramped up.
Ashley Dawson: (06:56)
So the land surrounding the Mississippi River was denied sediment, um, and it began to subside. So you had a phenomenon of the river’s kind of gradually raising up and the surrounding land sinking down. Now those conditions were dramatically exacerbated by the oil companies, which were drilling canals to gain access to oil in the area south of New Orleans over the last half century or so. And as soon as they would draw one of those canals, they would let in salty water from the Gulf, which would eat away at the surrounding land, like a kind of acid. So if you fly over what’s left of the Mississippi Delta, south of New Orleans, you can kind of see these long lines of the canals that have been, you know eaten away at all around them by um, uh, the salt water, creating what looks like a kind of Swiss cheese structure. Um, and as that’s happened, the, uh, ability of land to absorb the power of a storm coming in off the Gulf has been diminished, right?
Ashley Dawson: (08:07)
And so, not withstanding all of these powerful defenses, which the city of Louis of New Orleans is built, it’s increasingly vulnerable and is only going to get more and more vulnerable. Um, now what, uh, Louisiana is talking about doing is creating kind of planned, um, breaches of the levees so that more soil would be deposited in the delta and there would be these kinds of natural processes of building it back up again. The problem, however, is that not nearly as much sediment is coming down. The Mississippi is used to come down because so much topsoil has been washed off lands because of intensive capitalist agricultural patterns, you know, north of, uh, Louisiana. Um, and the amount of planned diversions of the river that you’d have to have to equal natural sediment deposition would be so massive that you would essentially have to move everyone out of what’s left of the, uh, of the delta.
Ashley Dawson: (09:07)
So there are lots of impediments given the way that we’ve built up the delta, um, and people are really beginning to move away from it. And you know, the kind of retreat is the ultimate solution, unfortunately at this, at this point. Um, but this history really is a testament to exactly what you’re asking me about, you know, the way we need to be able to think about ecosystems in their full complexity and across geographical scales that are very different from the kinds of skills that we’ve constructed. Whether they’re, you know, metropolitan or the scale of the nation-state. Nature just doesn’t abide by those kinds of hard and fixed lines.
Ashley Dawson: (09:50)
Why the city? Why coastal cities like New Orleans, New York as sites of what you call peril and promise. Um, I was thinking about the fact, and this goes back to your initial question about postcolonial studies. Um, I was thinking about the fact that the majority of humanity is now urban, um, that the vast majority of the urbanization that’s going to happen this century is going to take place in cities of the global south. Um, and there’s a lot of kind of colonial framing of urbanization that still shapes how we perceive that urbanization. You know, places like Lagos and Jakarta are often perceived through a kind of western lens as a bearance or failed examples of urbanization. And so critics like Mike Davis have alerted us to the fact that this planet, uh, “planet of slums” as he describes it, you know, is is something that is one of the key and defining characteristics of, for human experience essentially in this century.
Ashley Dawson: (10:57)
Um, yeah, I don’t think it gets dealt with enough. And thinking about that fact of planetary urbanization, um, for me necessarily entailed thinking about the impact of climate change on the city and the ways in which cities are themselves drivers of climate change. So, you know, as people move out of rural areas to cities, they tend to consume more. They tend to be connected to the grid and other forms of energy infrastructure that leads to carbon production. Um, and so planetary urbanization is a big driver of climate change. And yet in addition, cities are very much on the front lines of the impacts of climate change because cities have these highly developed and vulnerable infrastructures, um, even global south cities, you know, people, uh, as I said, want to have access to the grid, um, and live in close propinquity to one another. Uh, and that can mean that something like the urban heat island effect, which is, um, although we tend to think about sea level rise, um, uh, and fast onset natural disasters like hurricanes or tsunamis as the biggest threat to coastal cities.
Ashley Dawson: (12:08)
In fact, the urban heat island effect tends to be the most destructive form of climate change, at least in terms of raw numbers of people who, who suffer from, um, forms of anthropogenic climate change in an urban setting. So, yeah, thinking about the extreme vulnerability of cities is, is really important. And so I wanted to get at that dynamic and also, um, the link, what’s been happening. Um in instances which might be quite prominent in, um, readers in the global north and you know, in a North American setting, uh, after Hurricane Katrina and hurricane sandy to what’s happening in many other parts of the world. Because I think that neoliberal gl obalization has meant that a lot of urban development has taken place in coastal zones. You know, just think for instance, about the way that one of the key strategies of neoliberal globalization, um, has been to, um, offshore production, um, much manufacturing production to places, um, other countries like China where Labor is cheaper.
Ashley Dawson: (13:14)
Um, what parts of China have developed? Well it’s been cities, uh, like, um, Guangzhou, um, and Shenzen that are all based in the coastal areas and are highly vulnerable to climate change. So, you know, thinking about how some of the primary dynamics of the present moment connected to the growth, the global growth of capitalism are very much, um, shaping an urban future that we need to be thinking about and adapting ourselves for, I think is really kind of key. So the powerful term, you use this, the title of your book, which is extreme city, um, and you say global capitalism has run amok.
Can you define an extreme city? Because you don’t mean mega city, you’re not, you’re not talking about population, right? Yeah, yeah, exactly. Um, so there’s been a kind of tendency to try and come up with categories for cities and it tends to be a demographic one, right?
Ashley Dawson: (14:12)
So a city that has over 20 million people is a mega city, et Cetera, et Cetera, et cetera. And so I wanted to be clear that I’m not trying to come up with another designation. Um, although it needs to be recognized that the kind of question of scale is important in relation to cities. And many contemporary cities are these kind of sprawling conurbations that don’t actually stop at their kind of political boundaries. Um, but sprawl much more widely. So, you know, think about New York City, nominally it’s the five boroughs, but of course we have to include New Jersey, right? Um, probably everything from Boston to Washington DC could actually be said to be one massive conurbation. And there’s a similar kind of phenomenon in other parts of the world, you know, um, I’ve already talked about China, but one could also talk about, um, the whole area of West Africa, you know, that, um, stretches up and down around, um, Gulf of Guinea.
Ashley Dawson: (15:06)
So, um, those are important questions. But what I’m trying to get at when I talk about, um, the extreme cities, the kind of confluence of cities that are highly unequal as a result of the way that capitalism is playing out at the moment, particularly in terms of its financialization and, um, the way that that then connects to real estate development, I’m, and the pushing out of people who are not, um, part of the 1%. So you get cities that are incredibly economically stratified. Um, and you know, another element of this of course is kind of the sucking in of, um, populations from other parts of the world to the peripheries of cities, um, to serve the most well healed and elite. So you, you get a kind of doughnut shape of cities, uh, that
Ashley Dawson: (15:56)
kind of reproduces class and race inequalities. Um, and then the ways in which that kind of economic and social inequality is impacted by extreme forms of weather that are generated by climate change. So those are the two kinds of extremes I want to get at extreme economic forms of, um, urban inequality and then extreme weather. And I want to think about the way those two things interact with one another, right? Because the more economically an equal acidity or any other social group is, studies have shown the less capable, um, that social group is, uh, to deal with forms of disaster, whether it’s fast onset or more slow onset, you know, like increasing heat during the summer. So, um, it’s really important to think those two things in relation in relation to one another.
Can you talk about more, uh, can you talk about New York more specifically? Right. Um, so I think what we get from your book as the precarity of extreme cities, so that historical, relentless development of real estate projects on waterfront stretching back to colonialism or British imperialism. I’m wondering about New York specifically. Um, so what, what is happening? Um, the waters around New York, what exactly is going on in New York?
Ashley Dawson: (17:21)
Okay. Well to the waters around New York, um, the waters have not done particularly well. And the history of New York, I mean, of course a New York grew up as a maritime city prior to colonization. It was a very important site for NativeAmerican peoples. Um, a kind of gathering place. It had, um, some of the richest oyster beds in the entire eastern seaboard. Um, that’s one of the things that defined it as an important site for native Americans. And it also had immensely rich wetlands. You know, it’s a, it’s an estuary and estuaries tend to be some of the richest terrestrial ecosystems. Um, so both in terms of the flora and fauna, it’s an immensely rich and productive space where the sea meets the mighty Hudson and other rivers, you know, um, and so that wealth was incredibly important and explains why the city developed here.
Ashley Dawson: (18:27)
But over the last few centuries, a lot of the wetlands have been paved over and destroyed. The oyster beds have been minds essentially to extinction. And what was left of them was polluted to the point where they couldn’t survive. Um, that’s not to say that there isn’t a lot of natural abundance, um, in the waters around New York City. You know, we still have whales coming to the New York harbor, many different varieties of whales. Um, and uh, you know, New York is also an incredibly important site for wetlands. Um, uh, that are part of the, um, uh hmm flight ways of many, uh, bird migrant bird species. Uh, just to name a couple of examples of the great kind of natural, uh, Rich’s and different species that live in New York, uh, in and around New York’s waters. So, um, it’s important to recognize that richness historically to see how wrong headed the destruction of all of that wealth has been. And of course, to fight, to restore it and bring it back to life. Um, as you know, many people have been doing.
So a year before your book Extreme Cities came out, you wrote a little book called extinction, um, and in extinction, you argued that we can’t just think about species, environments and capitalism separately. MMM. So the city metabolizes natural worlds and at the same time ecologies metabolized cities. Can you talk about the relation, a relationship between the two books?
Ashley Dawson: (20:05)
Yeah. I’ll, I’ll say this again. Can you talk about the relationship between the two books?
Ashley Dawson: (20:10)
Yeah, of course. The, the importance of understanding that the crash, uh, of species around the planet is driven by a capitalist economic system, which is bent on assessing growth underlying that first book on extinction. Um, I didn’t write specifically about the city in the book. I wrote about particular examples such as, um, yeah, the well industry, the whaling industry, which in the 19th century industrialize you had ever bigger ships that were ever faster driven by, um, fossil fuels, which ranged widely, uh, all through the different oceans on the planet and witch hunted dominant species of whales to, if not to the point of extinction, to the brink of extinction to the point where the industry became unsustainable. You know, they just couldn’t make enough money to, to keep going. And so much of the European and North American whaling industry essentially crashed because of this very short sided, uh, attitude towards the natural world, which I argue is driven by capital capitalism.
Ashley Dawson: (21:26)
And by the inherent growth dynamic of capitalism. Um, how is all of that connected to extreme cities? Well, you know, urbanization is one of the dominant ways in which financialized capital is making itself manifest. Um, how does that play out? Well, basically, you know, as you have an increasingly wealthy 1% making money through the stock market and other forms of financialization, they need to find places to put that surplus accumulation and one of the best places to park it is in real estate, right? So cities become these sites of accumulation and the buildup of the built environment in cities, uh, transpires, uh, in hand in hand with the financial ization of capital. Um, now that’s really important and you can see it in a place like New York City over the last few decades because as it becomes more and more apparent that the destruction of the natural world, um, in and around cities is untenable.
Ashley Dawson: (22:30)
And just to go back for a second to your previous question about sort of multispecies existence in the city and why it’s necessary. Um, the destruction of wetlands around the city, for example, um, makes the city more vulnerable. I already talked about that in relation to New Orleans, but exactly the same thing is true in New York City. So in New York, we don’t really remember that. We used to have a lot of wetlands. Um, in fact, we do still have quite some, some important wetlands and they act as buffers. So when hurricane sandy pushed, um, a wall of water into not just the New York City harbor affecting downtown Manhattan, but also into Jamaica Bay, it was the wetlands around Jamaica Bay that absorbed some of that, um, storm surge and where the wetlands had been destroyed, the water was just able to come into people’s houses and into the streets.
Ashley Dawson: (23:20)
So it was extremely destructive because of the annihilation of the kind of multispecies communities that exist in wetlands. Um, so what we see over the last few decades is this increasing awareness that we need to conserve and restore nature in cities in order to make cities livable places for the long term, but then hand in hand with that a dynamic that’s driven by capitalism and real estate to pave over a lot of cities and to put development in places that make absolutely no sense. Um, and in the book I talk about, um, Michael Bloomberg’s plan YC, which was the first sort of important sustainability document or plan for New York, which had a lot of great ideas in it. Um, important policy innovations like planting a million trees and putting down hundreds of miles of bike paths that were really, really great. And you know, we need to do more of that sort of thing clearly.
Ashley Dawson: (24:20)
But then it also called for essentially building up parts of the city that, um, we’re kind of x industrial, um, uh, in areas that could have had wetland restoration take place, but instead are now lined with very expensive high rise condos like Williamsburg in Long Island city. And those areas are all extremely vulnerable. Um, to storm surge. So we’ve, we’ve really put people into places they don’t belong and raised levels of vulnerability in a way that makes no sense. If one thinks about what we could have done and what other cities are doing, hold on. So this is more important and I think I’m getting feedback from both of them. So want to focus on, okay.
Ashley Dawson: (25:21)
I don’t know if I’m being angry enough, I feel like I should get more angry. I fear being too like trying to figure out how to make it all sound rational. It should be talking about dead bodies and, yeah. Okay. Well maybe here, here’s the one thing, um, how, how would you want, uh, how would you want people to think about New York? So New York isn’t just a city. It’s a huge state with, um, farms, waterways, lots of different species. You mentioned the oysters, a wetlands, marshes. How can we think about the ecologies as, um, and for relationship between city and country, um, relationships between urban, suburban, rural, local, global, planetary. How would you, how would you, um, guide people through that? Yeah, that’s a great question. And it goes back to questions of scale. Um, I would say first of all, so I’ve already talked a little bit about how we need to think about sort of the demographics and political questions in terms of how we really map a city in its boundaries. Um, another element of that has to do with Wall Street, which we haven’t talked about. I mean, we’ve alluded to capitalism,
Ashley Dawson: (26:44)
but of course Wall Street is one of the epicenters of global capitalism. And so we really can’t think about New York City and its carbon footprint and it’s political and economic significance without thinking about Wall Street and global financialization. So it’s not just in terms of the kind of frenetic pace of building skyscrapers in New York City itself, in places that don’t make any sense like the Hudson yards or long island city. It’s in terms of the entire global arrangement of free trade, open borders and capital flows and investments into unsustainable forms of development. Um, you know, with capital seeking quick returns in fossil fuel extraction and extraction of minerals and many other things that are, we really need to step away from, uh, as the IPC has told us. Um, so the city of New York City needs to be thought of in terms of ms much larger dynamics, I would argue.
Ashley Dawson: (27:49)
Yet while we do all of that, we also want to be thinking about much more kind of local issues. And again, the kind of unevenness in the actual, um, terrain of New York City. So, um, there’s a tendency to see cities and homogenized terms, as I said at the outset that, you know, my experience showed that that was not true. And if you just look at the history a little bit, you can, you can see that that’s not true. So one of the main reasons that New York City is such an important site for environmental justice organizations and, and has so many environmental justice organizations is because populations of color in the city were targeted for particularly polluting industries. Um, whether it is, um, waste transfer stations or bus terminals or you know, other kinds of polluting industries that mean that working class populations and communities of color in the city have some of the highest rates of asthma as well as being, you know, some of the most heavily policed and incarcerated.
Ashley Dawson: (28:52)
So we need to think about those kinds of intersecting crises in order to understand how, um, the climate crisis is playing out on a kind of local level and then how people are trying to think about solutions. Right. So one of the things that I just wrote about recently after the book was, um, the proposal by New York City’s current mayor de Blasio to draw a lot of municipal power, in fact, 100% of the city’s power from a hydro Quebec. So this would mean putting a cable down the Hudson to get supposedly clean energy from dams. And Quebec. Sounds like a good proposal. Sounds like part of, you know, um, his continuation of plan nycs effort to the city. The problem is that dams are not sustainable. In order to make a damn, you have to flood a hell of a lot of land, usually with treason at those trees then to came released a lot of carbon.
Ashley Dawson: (29:53)
So hydro is not really a sustainable solution, whose land is it that gets flooded, tends to be indigenous people, um, particularly in Quebec, but in many other parts of the world too. Um, so it’s politically oppressive and probably of a contemporary extension of settler colonialism. So those kinds of issues of decolonization come up. And then in addition, it means that New York City is going to be getting a major source of power from somewhere else, right? So we’re not going to be creating the local forms of, of industry and employment that we would want to be creating. And that’s particularly important because environmental justice organizations like UPROSE, which is based in sunset park, have been arguing that we need to have renewable energy being produced locally. Um, so they recently formed New York state’s first solar co, not just New York city’s for solar coal up at New York state’s first solar co-op.
Ashley Dawson: (30:49)
Um, which is quite amazing. You know, we’re so late in the game, I’m so close to the kind of, uh, limits of according to the IPC of when we need to be 100% renewable, that we’re just getting the first solar coop. Um, it’s a big victory nonetheless. But the other thing they’ve been arguing for is using the Brooklyn navy yards to produce wind turbines, um, which at the moment, uh, there’s a big procurement, um, in for, uh, New York state’s built 9,000 megawatts of solar farm off the coast of Long Island city. It’s, it’s a really massive procurement enough to, um, run 6 million homes. So it’s a really, really good thing. But where are those wind turbines going to come from? As far as we know at the moment, a lot of them are likely to be shipped from Denmark across the Atlantic on big barges that will be run by, you know, diesel or some other form of fossil fuels.
Ashley Dawson: (31:48)
So, you know, instead of giving employment to local folks in communities that have historically been disadvantaged and producing these things locally, we’ve got this incredibly unsustainable setup playing out. Um, so, you know, thinking about the city both in terms of its kind of global impact, uh, in a, in a moment of enduring fossil capitalism, um, as well as thinking about how we need to address disparities in the city as we fight for a post fossil capitalists to kind of, you know, solar and wind and other modern renewable based economy I think is really, really important to do. Elaine on picking up your note taking. Okay. Okay. So Ashley you just
described um, water from dams in Quebec, a wind turbines from Denmark and then what New York gets, uh, lots of displacement and dispossession. Um, could you say a little bit more about this um solar coop, um, as well as some of the things you are doing at the climate action lab to engage people? MMM. You know how I, I guess that question is, um. What are key messages that you want people to hear? How do you want people to mobilize? How do you think people should get involved? Um, because things are so connected, right? Um, and because there are what you call environmental blowbacks to what we do. Um, how should we think about everyday climate actions or climate actions at multiple scales?
Ashley Dawson: (33:32)
Yeah. Well, I think the most important message to send out to people is that a kind of market oriented transition to renewables is
Ashley Dawson: (33:44)
Not happening fast enough. Right. And the reason it’s important to emphasize that is that, okay, for, well, at least the last decade there’s been an idea of that the market is going to save us. That’s, you know, in the Stern Report, which, you know, Nicholas Stern said we had to have this transition, but we could do it through market means. And that kind of overarching attitude has played itself out in some of the solutions proposed, mmm. At the United Nations for dealing with climate change. And it continues to play out in terms of the transition to renewable energy. And, and just to be clear about why this is such an important issue, um, of, of course we need to be thinking about a whole variety of other issues and thinking about how they interrelate. So, you know, when one talks about New York City, when also has to think about the fact that 70% of the carbon emissions from the city come from its it’s buildings.
Ashley Dawson: (34:37)
And so the recent big victory, um, for the climate mobilization act where the New York City Council voted to basically, um, impel big realtors, owners of buildings over 25,000 square feet to retrofit their buildings, cut their carbon emissions by 80% is a huge victory. And we should be thinking about how to do more of that on other kinds of scales, you know, for buildings smaller than 25,000 square feet. For me, the issue of energy is absolutely essential, right? Because we need to transition away from burning fossil fuels as quickly as we possibly can and that is not happening. Um, even though solar power has gotten cheaper, even though there were these projects such as the one that I mentioned of putting in place wind turbines, we are also in the middle of a massive boom of um, fossil gas and oil. You know, the fracking revolution has turned the United States into Saudi America.
Ashley Dawson: (35:39)
And as a result of that, we’re fighting pipelines all over the country and efforts to export not just from the Marcellus shale in western Pennsylvania to places like New York City, but you know, a lot of that stuff abroad to markets in other parts of the world. So we really need to be clear that we need to be fighting those kinds of projects, um, through nonviolent direct action, uh, through legal means and, um, through public education and intend with that, building out the renewable sector in ways that think about social and environmental justice as clearly as possible. So, um, thinking about those different connections is really important. Um, uh, now in terms of the question of climate action, I set up the climate action lab because I was interested in exploring what could be done on a kind of grassroots urban scale to deal with the climate crisis.
Ashley Dawson: (36:38)
As I already talked about, New York City has produced what had been some quite path breaking plans for the city. The, but that’s coming out of the municipal government and they’ve often been shortcomings right then. It’s often been some strange blend of good initiatives to green the city with real estate driven things that don’t make any sense. So I was very much inspired by a plan for northern Manhattan, which Arash car was odd. Uh, the urban planner did, working with the Environmental Justice Group, we act, which is based in Harlem. Um, and that plan came up with a whole lot of really vibrant proposals, um, that emphasized things like solar power, but not just to have renewable energy, but to provide jobs and income for people in the community, which had been so hard hit by, uh, histories of racism and economic marginalization. Um, other examples that were put forward in that, uh, Harlem plan include building social centers for people so that people would have a place to find refuge in the event of some kind of natural disaster like Hurricane Sandy.
Ashley Dawson: (37:56)
Uh, these would be places that would be elevated, that would be reinforced, that would have lots of social media so that people communicate with one another and with the outside world. Um, but in times that were not as, um, uh, heightened disastrous, um, in under normal conditions, they could also function as a kind of space where people could meet one another to create a kind of social glue to, to kind of thinking thick in the social networks which connect people. Um, and what we’ve seen in looking at, um, again, kind of both fast moving disasters like hurricanes and kind of more slow onset ones such as the urban heat island effect is that, um, natural disasters, um, have highly grievous impact when the social fabric has been shredded. Right. Um, so it that the means of redressing historical forms of racism, um, gender inequality, um, and the many other, uh, you know, horrendous forms of injustice that are circulating in cities today are also ways of dealing with climate change.
Ashley Dawson: (39:06)
Um, and unfortunately, politicians, um, even on the municipal level are often not the best at thinking and responding to the demands of communities for these kinds of innovative solutions, these kinds of solutions which redress historical inequalities. I mean, unfortunately, even under a nominally progressive politician like de Blasio, you know, whose, whose version of PlaNYC is called OneNYC, right? So it’s explicitly saying we need to move away from two cities from urban inequality. Nonetheless, he continues to rezone communities in New York City. And I’m doing that is a way of bringing in, um, big developments and amplifying gentrification and the marginalization of communities that are already struggling. So yeah, there needs to be some kind of hop paraplanning planning as a means of articulating visions of, um, alternative futures and possibilities and as a way of actually putting concrete pressure on politicians to change their tactics.
So they’re the hopeful side effects. Dream cities is a, there’s promise, right? And that problem is, yeah, for you lies not in, um, fortified seawalls but in urban movements. so, the social glue that you just talked about. So what, who should we be listening to? What kinds of social glues are worth our attentions at the moment?
Ashley Dawson: (40:35)
Hm. I think that
Ashley Dawson: (40:39)
Ashley Dawson: (40:41)
okay. Want to listen to people who have some expertise. I think the most exciting kinds of situations that I’ve come across are in collaborations between institutions that have a lot of specialized knowledge, um, often knowledge that’s trying to shift its its mode, um, of, of relating to the world, both, you know, the human social world and to the natural world. Um, uh, and then, you know, broader public. So, so let me give you an example of what I’m talking about. Um, the rebuild by design contest was sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation after Hurricane Sandy. And it was designed to basically come up with design solutions to areas that had been particularly hard hit by Hurricane Sandy. I think it was quite pathbreaking in that it wasn’t just a bunch of engineers or architects who would say, okay, here’s a problem. We’re going to come up, you know, in our, um, uh, ivory towers with wonderful solutions and then trot them out for the community and have a, a short kind of community time of speak back, which is usually the way these things are done in urban governance.
Ashley Dawson: (41:53)
Instead, the model was to put together teams of anthropologists, sociologists, um, uh, engineers, architects, and to send them out into communities, um, and, uh, have a, uh, an extended process of research and feedback and exchange with communities to the communities could really articulate what their needs were, what kinds of, um, transformations of the landscape and the urban fabric they wanted to see. Um, so the design solutions proposed would be not simply responding to the immediate damage that hurricane sandy caused, but too much more longstanding challenges and problems of the kind that I’ve been trying to address, which make it much harder for communities to be resilient in the face of, of climate change. And I think there were a lot of great proposals that came out of that contest for me. The most creative one was, um, the one proposed by the scape studio. Um, Kate Orff, her colleagues proposed this model of living breakwaters but I think is such a fascinating example of kind of multispecies community, right?
Ashley Dawson: (43:00)
So the idea was to deal with the flooding of parts of South East Staten Island during Hurricane Sandy, by building breakwaters off the coast, which are different from some kind of levee structure because they don’t give you the illusion of being totally cut off from the natural world and from storm surges, but they do kind of mitigate the storm surge. They, they cut the size of the waves as they come in off the ocean. And that means that you can build up natural defense systems, um, on land like, um, dunes, um, uh, with various different natural grasses on top of them that can do the rest of the job of absorbing the storm surge hopefully. Um, and you don’t have this false illusion of absolute security that a wall tends to create. Um, but then on top of the manmade breakwaters the proposal was to have oyster reefs, um, which would themselves grow as the waters in the New York Bay rise which inevitably they’re going to do.
Ashley Dawson: (44:02)
Um, and um, what this would do of course is to, to help with the storm surge mitigation. But, um, it would also be a natural way of cleaning the waters of the harbor and helping to resuscitate natural ecosystems. And it could also be part of engaging people in coastal communities with a deeper understanding of, um, the world around them, the natural world around them, which could include harvesting the oysters so they would have some source of economic benefit by supporting these kinds of mechanisms. So I think that’s one of the most creative examples of what could be done and the ways that people are shifting ideas about living with the natural world. Um, you know, so that we no longer sort of see the natural world is something out there that we need to build barricades against, but rather something that we can interact with and try and find our place within, in ways that are beneficial all around.
Ashley Dawson: (44:59)
Um, but I, I don’t want to say that rebuild by design was all roses. You know, there are lots of problems with it. Uh, the, um, proposal, which got funded the most was to essentially build a big levee around Wall Street, um, around downtown. Uh, and in fact, that’s the proposal which de Blasio’s not talking about implementing it, it’s where most of them on east going. Um, and while the city sort of says quite thoughtfully that downtown area is a place where a lot of the city’s infrastructure, um, converges. It’s a place where many subway lines come and it’s very important to employment in the city, including working class employment in the city. Um, nonetheless, you know, the, the symbolism and the material fact of, um, supporting Wall Street, um, and really putting the lion’s share of infrastructural support into Wall Street rather than into other parts of the city is, uh, obviously quite symbolic, um, problem.
Ashley Dawson: (46:00)
Um, and again speaks volumes about where the economic power and political power really resides in this city despite the vibrant social movements and environmental justice movements that I’ve been talking about. I think I remember seeing a photo of post-Sandy the only building downtown that was completely illuminated was Goldman Sachs. Yes, that’s right. Because they had their own private generator, right. So their ability to have this, I mean, kind of the neoliberal calculus of people being able to kind of think of themselves alone to escape into a kind of lifeboat was so evident from that. You know, they had their own generators, so when the rest of the grid crashed, they were fine. They had their power and they could keep trading while everyone else in the, in that area suffered. Um, and it’s also important to know that there’s a kind of pre history to all of this, and that has to do with, um, the 9/11 attacks and the way that the decimation of downtown was dealt with through forms of financial aid, which went to very well heeled communities, um, in the downtown area and bypassed, um, communities of color, particularly people living in Chinatown and the lower east side.
Ashley Dawson: (47:11)
Um, so, you know, Asian Americans and Latinex populations who lived in that area, but really didn’t get any significant portion of the aid, so that it’s not just the kind of, the symbolism of putting a barrier that’s going to save Wall Street in place. It’s also the way in disasters, disaster relief can often groove inequalities even deeper, right? So it’s not just the disaster that impacts people and exacerbates, um, forms of longstanding inequality. It’s the way that in the United States, um, yeah, the existing kind of uneven development of capitalism along racial, particularly racial fault lines gets, um, yeah, amplified by efforts to rebuild after disaster. That’s a big, big issue. I’m in New York City and all around the rest of the country.
We’ve talked a lot about that evenness, um, extraction metabolism. I’m wondering if we could, um, let’s see, how might we think about urgency? So what are the temporalities different timelines that are coming together? It seems to me with an extreme city, you’ve got the timelines of neo liberalism or relentless urban development, um, alongside the temporality of rising waters alongside the temporality of environmental movements, species extinctions. How do we map out different timelines, different urgencies, different crises. It’s long for some, slow for some, but very rapid for others. Um, and you know, you’ve been talking a lot about history, pre history, which is actually really, really useful in thinking about crises. How do we think about temporalities?
Ashley Dawson: (49:03)
Hmm, that’s a great question. Um, I think it’s really important to be aware of the ways in which the contemporary media tends to focus almost exclusively on mediagenic disasters, which tend to be fast moving like hurricanes and to play down the other forms of what Rob Nixon calls slow violence, um, which play out. Um, whether that’s toxicity effecting bodies, like, you know, high rates of asthma in, ah, places that are cited for including industries in cities and in rural areas as well. Of course. Um, uh, or things like the urban heat island effect, which I have referred to a number of times. Um, just to be clear about what that is, you know, obviously cities that have a lot of concrete tend to be much hotter than the areas around them. And that means that people who don’t have the economic means to access, uh, air conditioning, um, or other forms of cooling, uh, tend to be, um, placed in harm’s way during hot.
Ashley Dawson: (50:11)
Snaps. Um, and of course, if that means not just on a personal level, but when cuts to public services like libraries mean that they can’t go to a place where they can access cooler environments. And this is more and more of a, a kind of crisis all over world. Um, and of course in some parts of, of the global south cities are literally becoming too hot to be alive in. And this is in places where the vast majority of the population is living in informal settlements, you know, sort of in shanty towns. So, um, we’re really talking about a crisis, which is really, really dramatic for a lot of people, but is also kind of playing out more slowly and often isn’t emphasized in media depictions of climate change. Um, so I mean, I feel like I run around with my hair on fire because I feel like we should all be in the streets and we should all be protesting the fact that, um, our governments are not taking this stuff seriously enough.
Ashley Dawson: (51:09)
In fact, you know, I, my sense is that we’re in a very dangerous trajectory as, um, the situation deteriorates. Um, both in terms of the climate and in terms of, um, the economy. You know, as neo liberalism continues to fail, the vast majority of populations, there’s a tendency to, um, engage in forms of authoritarian populism and particularly to turn towards what I call extractive as populism. We see that with Trump and his kind of America first energy plan. So he’s not just denying climate change, but he’s saying, you know, we need to bring back coal. We need to open up the Arctic to more oil drilling. Um, and he’s captured a segment of the American working class. By doing that, you know, in addition to his kind of explicit racism and all these anti immigrant stuff, you know, this, this kind of idea that we need to make America great by going back to the heyday of fossil capitalism.
Ashley Dawson: (52:11)
Um, and he’s not the only person doing this, you know, um, we see just recently, uh, an Australian politician who brought a lump of coal into parliament and said that when he turns back, this call was reelected as prime minister. Um, and of course in Brazil, the current, um, president j are both Sonero, um, explicitly campaigned on opening the Amazon up for exploitation. So there’s this kind of sense that as the climate crisis grows more grave and, and as it becomes a crisis that’s compounded by the failure of neoliberal capitalism, there’s a turn to more and more extractivism, um, which is justified on populous grounds and you get an increasing vilification, um, you know, not just of, um, uh, women and Queer people and, uh, you know, immigrants, but also of anyone who wants to think about the ways in which, um, those targeted populations interact with the environment and the survival of communities, um, and environmental terms. So I think this is a really, really kind of grave crisis and we need to be fighting as much as we can for really very, very radical
Ashley Dawson: (53:26)
solutions, right? So the, we know that the big fossil fuel companies are quite happy funding climate denialism and quite happy with Trump in power, but that they’re already beginning to talk about carbon taxes as the solution because they know that eventually he will be gone or that they need to, you know, uh, when the terrain and the argument in places that are not quite so reactionary like the European Union. But that carbon taxes are going to continue the system of fossil capitalism. So I think we need to be putting much more radical proposals on the table. Um, I think the green new deal is a really important, um, kind of argument because it both sets forth the plan for a really massive transition that is on the scale of the nation state. And I would argue it needs to be on the scale of, of the globe, right?
Ashley Dawson: (54:19)
Because as planetary urbanization happens, as I said, more and more people get on the grid. And so we need to be sending a renewable technology, um, uh, as it’s developed to those folks and helping them come up with their own technologies, um, you know, uh, forms of sort of, uh, local flexible technologies, um, as much as possible, um, in order to kind of fight this, um, extractivist populism. Um, and we also need to talk about very radical proposals like nationalizing the fossil fuel companies and shutting them down as quickly as possible, um, while transitioning workers in those areas, um, to renewable industries or to other industries. And I think the green new deal does a great job of doing that, right? Trying to, um, make social justice arguments and arguments about just transition in order to, um, provide an alternative to the kind of racist, um, extractive as populism that Trump and you know, the many similar figures around the planet are articulating today.
Ashley Dawson: (55:29)
So I think it’s a kind of key terrain of struggle, um, which we all need to be thinking about fighting for and pushing forward and a whole variety of different ways in scales because cities can be labs for experimenting with green new deal solutions before they get proposed on a national scale. And, uh, as I’ve, as we’ve been talking about in the course of our conversation, I think New York has done that, but many other cities are also doing that. So I’ll ask, because I know you, you know, a great deal about, about it. Um, can you map out the difference between carbon taxes or maybe defined for as carbon taxes, what the implications are, why are people for that and some people against the green new deal. Can you map out the differences between the two implications for different groups? Yeah, yeah. I think the reason that a lot of people, like
Ashley Dawson: (56:24)
I do you have a carbon tax is because it’s a kind of free market solution. So it doesn’t challenge the dominant ideology of today too much. Um, so the idea would be that you would put a tax on any consumption of carbon. Um, there are different ways of doing it. Um, obviously, uh, the tax could be more or less steep and the IPC has argued that essentially needs to be so steep that it would be similar to outlawing, um, fossil fuel exploitation. Um, and, and so, you know, my argument against the carbon tax partially comes from the fact that it’s not really a democratic way of shutting down the life of Exxon and BP and all these other climate criminals. You know, we can come up with much more democratic ways that are likely to help workers much better than, um, some kind of market oriented solution.
Ashley Dawson: (57:20)
Um, the, the other problem with them, you know, is that in fact, they tend not to be as steep as the IPC is proposing. So, um, the big fossil fuel corporations are quite happy with them because they know that, yeah, it’s gonna get more expensive to buy gasoline and yet people are going to still be buying gasoline and you know, then they’re going to get, get to keep exploring for more in producing more for the foreseeable future. So, uh, it’s not something that helps us make the really fast transition away from fossil capitalism that we need to make. Um, so he’s still, he’s the main argument that it’s non democratic and it’s, it’s free market solution basically. Corporations can just pay more. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. And it relies on a kind of, um, smoke and mirrors strategy to deal with a climate catastrophe. Um, and you know, there’s been, not many people know about this, but in the United Nations negotiations around climate change, there’s been a big push to accept the premise of geoengineering.
Ashley Dawson: (58:37)
So, even though Geo engineering does not work economically to scale, so it shouldn’t be a neo liberal kind of economic solution because it’s a policy that is dysfunctional now and in the foreseeable future because it would not only potentially cause absolute mayhem to the environment, you know, if you spread a bunch of sulphur up into the atmosphere, you can’t tell exactly what it’s going to do. It could interrupt the monsoon cycle, um, in South Asia and you know, starve billions of people, for example. You can’t be absolutely sure and you could have kind of interim Purell warfare in the atmosphere taking place with one nation saying, oh right, I’m going to spread some sulfur to cool down the environment over my country. And then another nation being like, oh, right, well I’m going to do the same mine. And then, you know, who knows where it’s all going to end up.
Ashley Dawson: (59:22)
So there, there are lots of very scary, kind of political potential ramifications for all of this. Um, but it doesn’t work economically either. And yet it has been now hardwired into, um, the scenarios which the United Nations predicts for how to cope with climate change and what the possible trajectories of warming are. So the reason that these big fossil fuel companies can say, oh, we need to have carbon taxes, um, is, you know, they basically say, you know, we can’t have an abrupt transition away from fossil fuels because it would be too economically damaging. We need to ask, well, to who exactly. Um, and we don’t need to worry about it so much because you know, we can keep polluting for a long time and then after 2050, we can just do geoengineering and absorb all the carbon back out of the atmosphere. Um, which is completely stupid if you think about it even for just a second, right?
Ashley Dawson: (01:00:18)
Because, um, oceans are kind of like the titanic. Once it gets going in a certain direction, it’s very hard to change course once you put a lot of energy into an ocean. Um, and the oceans have been absorbing most of the energy, um, and carbon that we’ve admitted over the last 200 years. Um, even if you suddenly stop emitting carbon, the oceans are still going to keep warming, right? They have that trajectory. You’ve passed certain kind of tipping points and you’re going to melt a hell of a lot of glacier in Greenland and Antartica. And so, you know, you have kind of baked into the system, even if geoengineering where feasible economically or politically, um, the flooding of most major coastal areas, which means literally hundreds and hundreds of millions of people in all the world’s coastal cities being displaced. Right? So, um, that’s the kind of future that these corporations are talking about. And I think we need to be clear. It’s, it’s really genocide that they’re talking about, you know, they are climate criminals who’ve been actively denying and propagandizing against being aware of climate change for the last few decades, and they’re prognosticating genocide against hundreds of millions of people around the world. And we need to be clear about that and to really fight for some other future.
Yeah. So speaking of futures, um, so in a video online, Kristen and I actually watched you start a talk with Dr Seuss,
Ashley Dawson: (01:01:49)
with the Lorax. I do? We loved it!
So it seems the Lorax was a library book that you and your daughter had read that morning. So I like it a lot because you’re doing three things. Um, one is you’re, you’re describing the problem in really accessible terms. The second is your talking about sort of the art of storytelling, the power of storytelling. And the third is actually you’re talking about libraries.
Ashley Dawson: (01:02:20)
You’re talking about public libraries. Um, so I wonder if you can tell us about those three things. Um, that’s a huge question, but they seem like things we really, really need today, right? To think about the future. So one is the imagination, the Lorax, um, second is the art and science of storytelling. Um, and the third is public libraries or institutions. Um, okay, great. Um, the Lorax is such a great story. Doctor Seuss was quite the radical and quite ahead of his time, at least in, in the, the Lorax. Um, for those of you who don’t know, the Lorax is a story, um, about someone who is a kind of protector of, of the trees and um, who comes to tell the story of how this desire to produce completely useless things, I think they’re called Thneeds. It’s some sort of, looks like a, a pair of, what are they called?
Ashley Dawson: (01:03:26)
Um, uh, long Johns looks like a pair of long Johns that are produced from these trees that get chopped down. you know, how this manufacturing of useless, um, materials and the manufacturing of desire for those materials leads to the destruction of habitat. And the Lorax kind of is the lonely, um, Guardian and the person who bears testimony to the world that once was before all of the trees were chopped down. Um, so yeah, I think you’re right that it gets at all these different, kind of this conjunction of important factors. We need imagination I think, because we need to be as creative as possible to think our way out of the present situation. Um, I come from a background of cultural studies and literary studies. And so I’m very much aware of the way in which our sense of the future has been written already.
Ashley Dawson: (01:04:25)
Um, it tends to be written by Hollywood. right? That’s the dominant form of media, the dominant form of public narrative and storytelling. And it tends to be apocalyptic, you know, it tends to center on a, um, violent white male who is able to assert himself, um, under very difficult circumstances and gain a band of followers around him and lead them to some kind of salvation in a landscape that’s imagined as completely barren and free for the taking. And so a lot of this imaginary of climate apocalypse, I think just rehearses many of the tropes of settler colonialism and, and, um, we need to really question it. Um, both for, you know, some of the things that are implicit in that history that I’ve just recounted and in terms of the way that it forecloses kind of community mobilization and the possibility for collectively imagining other really creative solutions to climate crisis.
Ashley Dawson: (01:05:31)
Um, let me just give you one kind of very concrete example. Um, we have, um, the possibility of a shifting everything to electricity. We need to electrify everything, right? As part of this transition. Um, increasingly the, the ideas that we need to shift to electric vehicles, um, in fact, uh, Fiat and Chrysler just announced that they want it to emerge, um, with the French major French auto company in order to kind of scale up to cope with this transition. But why couldn’t we, instead of imagining shifting or switching from combustion engine private automobiles to electric vehicles, um, imagine forms of collective transportation, um, or imagine even cities that, um, didn’t have any cars within them whatsoever. Right? So, you know, we could be thinking about much more Utopian and collective possibilities than the ones that are furnished to us by capitalism. Um, and that’s about, um, really thinking broadly about, um, possible alternatives and shifting the kinds of stories we tell.
Ashley Dawson: (01:06:42)
Um, I particularly liked George Monbiot’s analysis of the importance of stories and narratives and the way in which, and what Monbiot says is that, um, the kind of ur-narrative, um, for social movements is that, um, some evil force has taken over the kingdom or the land or whatever you want to call it and is oppressing the people. And we need to come up with, um, some hero or some alternative that overthrows that oppressive power. And he sort of talks about how that played out in the World War Two era with the new deal and Keynesianism and you know, the kind of rise of social democracy with the story being that fascism had been the oppressive force. And then neoliberalism came along and said, oh, well, you know, the state has got its boot on our necks and we need to liberate ourselves from this, uh, you know, nanny state, which is not functioning and not bringing us the things we need.
Ashley Dawson: (01:07:39)
And we need to set free the dynamic entrepreneurial capacity of individual subject. And, you know, we know how that’s worked out, not so well. Um, and of course, uh, it’s producing fascism around the world. So we really need to come up with some other stories about collective possibility and potential. Um, and I think the green new deal is a perfect example of that kind of a story. Um, that kind of an idea that through collective mobilization we can build solidarity with one another and transform our world. And doing that relies on institutions, right? It means that we need to challenge the idea that the state doesn’t work, that, um, public power doesn’t make any sense. And I mean that in both senses of power, public power in the sense of energy, but also public power in the sense of the collective capacity of us to join together.
Ashley Dawson: (01:08:37)
Um, and I, I don’t want to be too utopian, you know, I mean, of course there are massive fragments in the social body, huge inequalities that we shouldn’t blithely dismiss or skate over in our efforts to build solidarity. But I think the idea of fighting for functioning public sector and for, um, collective solidarity and transformation is a really, really important narrative which we need to, um, work to recirculate both as a story and, um, through political mobilization and through the creation of institutions that do that. You know, we need public banks, we need to municipalize our utilities, um, and control them democratically fund them democratically. I could go on and on with specific examples, but yeah, you get the point that, um, uh, we really needed to change how we think and also how we act.
Couple more questions. Okay. How are you doing? I’m okay. Okay, great. Great questions. Okay. Um, you write about C.S. Holling’s theory of resilience.
Ashley Dawson: (01:09:47)
MMM. In the way, uh, invite us to move away from centralized control towards cultivating optimal conditions, which is in the way a little bit of
Ashley Dawson: (01:09:59)
what you’ve been talking about. Um, yeah. Can we spell out for whom? Optimal Conditions for who? Yeah. Um, so in extreme cities, I’m critical of the idea of resilience, which comes out of the biological sciences as an alternative to sustainability. Right? So sustainability assumes a system which doesn’t really change. Anytime there’s some perturbation, you want it to return to the state it was in and it presumes the system, which is relatively homogeneous. So what’s interesting about what Holling is doing is that he is aware that systems are made up of units that connect to one another. Um, and that in order to make systems function so they don’t collapse as a whole, the best way to do it is to link up different pieces. Um, so that maybe one area of a complex system can, um, uh, deal with breakdown or perturbation, but it doesn’t crash the entire system. So this, this way of thinking about
Ashley Dawson: (01:11:08)
ecosystems as complex wholes that are interconnected or that have interconnecting parts has proliferated way beyond the biological sciences to the point where resilience has become a kind of fetish term or a dogma, right? In many different disciplines. So everyone wants to be resilient these days. Um, you know, it’s something that the military industrial complex is striving for in, um, you know, the face of a quote unquote terror. It’s, um, something that is very much part of disaster planning, um, and has been taken on board by disaster planning, but it’s also a very dominant term in areas like high finance, right, which itself, um, is prone to massive collapses every now and then. So, you know, stockbrokers want to know how they can hide themselves off the next time that something like the bank crisis of 2008 comes around. Um, the problem I have with the term is that it tends to dovetail very easily with a kind of neoliberal, um, way of thinking about the world.
Ashley Dawson: (01:12:13)
So instead of thinking about, um, how we need to build up the public sector and reengage with, um, collective forms of survival, it places the onus on individuals. You know, you should build up your own resiliency, whether it’s through, you know, getting your disaster survival kit ready in your apartment, um, or being the appropriate entrepreneurial subject, you know, and making enough money to buy flood insurance or to have a second home in the Rockies or wherever it is, you know. Um, so I think it very easily, um, plays into a kind of neo liberal way of thinking about things. And the way that I, um, substantiate that claim is by looking at the Rockefeller Foundation’s rebuild by design contest and, and showing how a lot of their ideas of resiliency, which are absolutely central to, to that contest until a lot of the Rockefeller Foundation’s rhetoric, um, are very much connected to big corporations that are engaged in financialization, um, you know, privatizing water supplies around the world, for example, uh, as well as data mining for security purposes so that they’re, um, bleeding over from kind of privatized security, um, and surveillance into state-led, um, uh, surveillance efforts.
Ashley Dawson: (01:13:39)
Um, and so yeah. Um, I, I think that term is quite suspect and while we might want to acknowledge its potency originally in the biological sciences and how it might be useful to think with in terms of how we analyze ecosystems, we shouldn’t too quickly be willing to accept it in relation to the human social world and the ways in which politics and economy play out in the contemporary moment. Great. Thank you. I actually misread that. So thank you. That’s a great, great, brilliant answer.
Okay. So what, when you think about extinction, what comes to mind for you? Is there, is there a particular species in New York, particular ecology? MMM. Is that you’re, you know more or less attached to, more committed to, um, you write about whales being in a way that, you know, the species that’s kind of borne the brunt of human extraction. You want the industry. MMM. Oysters, you know, is there a particular species that comes to mind?
Ashley Dawson: (01:14:47)
Well, maybe not one particular species, but one kind of ecosystem. Um, as I said, close to the outset, New York, um, city is an estuary. It has had immensely rich wetlands wetlands absorb seven times as much carbon as rainforests. So they’re both immensely rich ecosystems and really important because systems, um, to, uh, bring back in cities and in kind of peri metropolitan areas. I mean, we, we really need to rewild cities essentially. And I think for the vast majority of coastal cities, the way to do that is to rebuild wetlands in every possible part of the city. Um, and so yeah, that can play a very important role in coping with storm surge. You know, we should be looking to visionary forms of design and landscape architecture of like the scape studio that I mentioned to think about how we could kind of green the edges of cities through building out wetlands.
Ashley Dawson: (01:15:54)
Um, and that can also play a really important role in waste remediation of various different kinds. You know, I mean, in New York City, every time that it rains hard raw sewage gets distributed into all of our bodies of water and that creates algae and you know, um, kills fish and other populations including oysters. So, um, yeah, coping with that through rebuilding wetlands is really important and wetlands can also absorb a tremendous amount of carbon. So if I had to pick like one kind of ecosystem that I think is particularly important, it would be rebuilding wetlands, um, with all of the species that come with them.
Yeah. Okay. Last question. I remember you said you teach at the college of Staten Island and you take the ferry. Yes, I do. So I’m wondering: since we were talking about waterways New York as an archipelago, ah, five boroughs are an archipelago. Are there things you’ve observed firsthand, um, that have influenced how you think about waterways? Hmm. Are there changes over the past few years on that ferry.
Ashley Dawson: (01:17:08)
MMM. Well, one of, the main things that one notices on the ferry is, um, the fact that the New York City harbor is in Bayonne, um, which means that all of the massive ocean going containerships that bring cars and underwear and all the other commodities that we consume here from the places where they’re produced, uh, they all go through the kill van kull, which separates Staten Island from New Jersey and round to the New York City harbor in Bayonne. Um, and of course that’s had a major impact on New York City, um, which most people don’t know about, but you know, the economic crash, uh, in the 1970s which, um, demolished CUNY and we’re still feeling the reverberations of that. Um, which led to the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs. And to the kind of ascendancy I kind of push by, um, real estate elites, including David Rockefeller, which became the paradigm for implementing neoliberalism around most of the rest of the world.
Ashley Dawson: (01:18:14)
A lot of that had to do with the shift of the harbor, um, uh, to Bayonne away from Downtown Manhattan and Brooklyn. So, that’s the most clear thing that one notices. And there’ve been big struggles about that, which most New Yorkers don’t know about, right. So, um, ships are getting bigger and bigger container ships, you know, there. Um, now, um, some of them are too wide to go through the Panama Canal. And so to go through the kill van kull um, the, um, bridge that links Staten island to ban had to be raised because of the ships are so high and they had to blast the stone underneath the kill van kull this waterway. And so, you know, there was a massive disruption. The people who live along that area, which is, um, one of, uh, New York’s so-called significant maritime industrial areas, which are the most polluted places.
Ashley Dawson: (01:19:06)
And also the places that have the strongest environmental justice organizations. They had to fight very hard against this, this change, and they lost that struggle. So most New Yorkers don’t know anything about this. And I think they don’t really know anything about the harbor and the life of the harbor. And so I think just in general, if you take the Staten island ferry, it’s very important because of the way that it reorients you and shifts the Lens on New York City so that you realize that New York is actually a city built around a massive living, important body of water rather than a city built around central park, you know, or around prospect park or something like that. Wow. No, I had no idea. Yeah. Yeah. We should do, we should do another episode. Yeah, yeah. Right. You know, the history of New York City’s harbors is fascinating and the impact of containerization and how that shaped all the politics and yeah, it’s, it’s huge topic. Hmm. Yeah, that’s right. Wow. Oh, incredible. .
Hi, how are you doing? I should open this up and say if there’s, can do anything you’d like to add or any questions you have?
Ashley Dawson: (01:20:27)
What time is it? I’m not w four 15. Okay. So we’ve got quite a lot of time. Okay. MMM, I’m doing pretty well. Um, yeah. Um, let’s see. Other issues? Yeah. To think about. I have, I have another question. Okay, sure. Yeah, sure. Yeah. MMM.
Okay. So Amitav Ghosh postcolonial writer, Amitov Gosh, in his book, the great derangement writes about being caught in a tornado that hit the center of Delhi in 1978.
Ashley Dawson: (01:21:00)
And the inability of journalists, writers to find the words to describe the event because it was both
Ashley Dawson: (01:21:06)
so improbable and so massive. Yeah. Okay. So your, your book, um,
opens with superstorm Sandy.
Ashley Dawson: (01:21:16)
I’m wondering if you can take us through that creative decision as a writer, your writing process. Yeah. Thinking about, you know, the complexities that you’ve just talked about, being able to map them. Awesome. No. Can you talk a little bit about your writing process and your research process? Yeah, sure. Thank you. That’s a great question. Okay. I wanted to start where I was and who I was, who I am, because I wanted to make clear the ways in which the city is not homogenous, the way it is unequal. So, um, I start by narrating what for me was a very distressing experience. You know, Sandy was blowing rain into the brick walls and the mortar of our apartment building and the water was soaking through the wall and creating this giant blister in the paint. I mean, literally it was sort of 10 foot by 20 foot. And so I was up all night mopping up the water as it seeped out onto our wood floors and it wasn’t quite clear what was going to happen next, whether our power was going to short out whether the entire wall was going to fall in or you know, whatever it was.
Ashley Dawson: (01:22:31)
It wasn’t just a lost night of sleep. It, it really seemed as if the building was on the edge of collapse. And so it was quite terrifying. And yet the same time, there’s also a bit surreal. It seemed like something out of a Kafka episode, you know, because the walls seem to be breathing. Um, uh, and Eh, mmm. Coming alive. So I wanted to tell that story for all its kind of surreal power. But then I also wanted to talk about what happened when I left Jackson Heights, which the night after, the day after sandy had passed was back to functioning just as normal and we had power and you know, people were unloading food and the local supermarkets and everything seemed completely fun. Um, I then wanted to talk about traveling to Staten Island. I was chair at the time and so after a couple of days, um, even though the power was just getting back up at college of Staten Island, the dean called us back in to try and get the department running again.
Ashley Dawson: (01:23:29)
And you know, because of the nature of precarious labor in the CUNY system, we had adjuncts from far and wide. We had students from all over the city. But particularly, as I’ve said at the outset, many students who live on Staten Island, he had been really damaged by, um, the hurricane, um, personally. MMM. And then I wanted to tell some other stories as well. I wanted to tell the story of a colleague who lived in downtown and who had survived 9/11, um, and then been displaced by hurricane sandy and watch the storm waters rising and been without power for a week or so after Hurricane Sandy. Um, and then tell the story of someone whom I interviewed who lived in Red Hook and was in this community that was flooded out. Um, she’s African American, her son’s car was completely destroyed and the community really had to band together around this place where she worked, which was a kind of community organization, uh, called Red Hook initiative that, um, began serving food to people in the public housing projects.
Ashley Dawson: (01:24:39)
Um, uh, in red hook, which is the biggest public housing project in all of Brooklyn. And people lost their power, which meant they, uh, couldn’t travel out of their apartments. Um, they couldn’t get medicine. They were without heat because the boilers which are in the basement, you know, um, got flooded and destroyed. Um, so you often had, you know, elderly people freezing in the cold, enabled to access diabetes medicine or something like that. So people really, um, uh, in, uh, apparel for their lives. So being able to tell these different kinds of stories, I think I’m okay. It was a way I wanted it to draw people into the narrative, um, and connect with them by telling stories that were engaging and upsetting, but at the same time, to illustrate the broader point and someone had to make throughout the book, which had to do with these ways in which climate extremes are impacting very extremely unequal cities and how those two things interact with one another. So yeah, telling that story was a way of getting it, those things in a very visceral way that I hoped would make people understand and make them care.
Speaker 4: (01:25:50)
It definitely, yeah,
Ashley Dawson: (01:25:52)
the intention. Yeah, absolutely. That’s great.
Speaker 4: (01:25:54)
Yeah. Yeah. Um, okay. I’m looking through any, any other, I think we hit all the big stuff. Um,
Ashley Dawson: (01:26:14)
how long does it take you to research the book? So your sources are broad, broad ranging. You talk about Miami Jakarta, uh, Holland. Rotterdam, just incredible. Yeah, it took me, um, about two years to research and about two years to write, although I didn’t stop the researching while I was writing. So yeah, it was about a four year project total. And I was lucky to have one of those years be a sabbatical, so I was doing nothing but reading and then doing the research. Um, but it was a big departure for me. I’m an English professor postcolonial studies scholar by training, so I’m used to reading literary text and what other scholars say about them and then writing my own opinion about it, you know, not interviewing people. Um, so that was both challenging and really, really exciting. Um, and yeah, I had fun, for instance, going to meet the mayor of south Miami and having him show me the water coming up in his backyard and, you know, explain to me why this was significant.
Ashley Dawson: (01:27:25)
Um, so, and then being able to tell those stories. It was, it was great fun to do that. You know, putting narratives together is actually quite fun even while it can be quite challenging to create a weave of personal narrative of interviews, of research, of like putting a lot of scientific research in lay person’s terms, um, and sort of shuffling backwards and forth between all those different registers. Um, so yeah, it was definitely a challenging experience for me to write the book, but it was also extremely pleasing. And, you know, always in the background, I had the idea of writing in a way that would engage people. Um, uh, you know, I was immensely lucky to be, um, um, trained by or to be around a great scholars of postcolonial studies like Edward Said and Rob Nixon and Anne mcClintock for whom the importance of writing in a kind of vernacular voice that could connect with people was, was always primary and very clear.
Ashley Dawson: (01:28:28)
And, um, so while I’ve tried to do that in my previous books, I think in this one I took that to the furthest extreme. And so it was both the most challenging but also the most fun to write, even though it’s clearly about a very upsetting topic. Um, yeah. Nonetheless, the kind of making the urgency of the issue and the way that people are trying to think about it on the ground clear to people, um, with something that was, um, you know, engaging to do. One of the things we’re hoping for the podcast is actually that.
Teachers might use it in classrooms at different levels. So, um, so one thing to ask you is also, um, how do you tell your students, how do you tell your, you know, people who are dearest to you, your children, your child about climate change, which is in the way really terrifying. I’m almost paralyzing, um, subject. So how do you in a way scaled down this fairly abstract, also dehumanizing demoralizing scale of climate change, um, for younger generations.
Ashley Dawson: (01:29:40)
How’d you, how’d you tell them about climate change?
Ashley Dawson: (01:29:46)
Well, I often get asked, um, whether I’m hopeful or how I keep hope alive and in the face of, because one has to given the climate denialism one has to be frank, and it’s not just figures like Trump, you know, even the Sciences are always behind, um, in terms of its projections, you know, for a whole variety of reasons. Right. So, you know, projections about sea level melts, uh, in Antarctica weren’t even included in IPCC documents because the scientists weren’t sure about the rate of the melt. So they basically just said, okay, so we just won’t factor the Antarctic ice sheets into our calculations for sea level rise because of the kind of institutional nature of the IPCC and the fact that it’s intergovernmental and they could be attacked if their science wasn’t exactly right. And so even the science is very conservative. So you have to constantly be saying, yes, it’s more apocalyptic than you think.
Ashley Dawson: (01:30:41)
Um, while at the same time saying, well, you know, don’t despair, don’t go home and just watch TV or whatever you do when you feel as if there’s no hope. Um, so I guess, you know, I sometimes I have recourse to tell personal stories and that has to do with the fact that I’m from South Africa. Um, and my family’s response to apartheid when I was young was to, um, put blinkers on and pretend that it wasn’t happening. Um, and then we left South Africa in order to kind of escape the trauma of apartheid essentially. And the fact that there was universal white male conscription and all these wars going on in the border. Um, and because of that, I didn’t get to, um, be part of the struggle against apartheid. And so for me, on a personal level, the struggle against, um, the climate crisis feels like a kind of, mmm.
Ashley Dawson: (01:31:43)
a kind of moment of reckoning that is of even greater amplitude than the struggle against apartheid. You know, the, the agonists and the evil doers or just as clear if, if not more clear than in the era of apartheid. the stakes are so much greater. I mean, I really think we are talking about, um, the feasibility for much life on the planet in the medium term. Um, uh, being at stake and in the short term, you know, um, population that’s being targeted for genocide who have historically been targeted for precisely that. Um, and we get to be part of that titanic struggle and think about radically new and different futures. We have to think about them because we can’t just keep going the way we’ve been going. You know, capitalism is not working, not just politically and economically for the vast majority of people, but it’s, it’s chewing up the planet that it depends on.
Ashley Dawson: (01:32:42)
And so we absolutely have to think about completely different ways of living. Um, and I want to emphasize that that is, um, an incredibly, um, exciting struggle to be part of because we get to connect with other people and fight that struggle. Not that it’s easy or, um, uh, not discouraging sometimes, but, um, it’s also a struggle for emancipation, which is incredibly moving to be part of and a struggle for different futures that is very exciting to contemplate and help to forge. So, yeah. Um, I think that’s how I respond to this kind of question of how to keep going and how to make sense of things and not be despairing and whether you are hopeful. Yeah. And whether I’m hopeful. Yeah, exactly. Thank you so much. My pleasure. Really wonderful. Wonderful conversation. Oh yeah. Thank you for your wonderful questions, both of you.
Ashley Dawson: (01:33:43)
So fun. Um, yeah, I, I hope I answered Okay and didn’t stumble over things too much. Oh, it’s fabulous. Totally seamless. Amazing. I have to read my questions just saying, oh, thank you. Anything you’d like to put in? I mean, we can, you know, we can also add or clarify anything later. Um, I’m trying to think of if there’s anything else. Um, well the the only other thing that I would add, um, in terms of that sort of last question but kind of thinking more broadly is that, um, when I say the way to not be despairing is to engage in the struggle and connect with other people, that can sound a bit abstract, but I think the message is that there’s so many different scales of political struggle, um, that one can engage in what we tend to get told by the dominant media, by the dominant kind of system and its ideologies is the way to go is to recycle more.
Ashley Dawson: (01:35:05)
Right? Like, you know, engage in some individual form of consumerist politics or you know, greener consumerist politics. And I don’t want to poo poo, um, recycling. Um, uh, although of course there’s a global political economy of recycling and that’s highly problematic. But, um, do I think it would be a good thing if everyone in New York City composted and Went Vegan? Yes, I do. Um, however, there has to be a bigger kind of shift. Um, and I think that there are, there’s, there’s a lot of exciting political ferment right now and all sorts of different scales, you know, so, um, whether it’s figuring out how to set up a solo cooperative, um, in the building or the neighborhood that you live in or you know, um, joining a DSA in your city and fighting for a green new deal in your city with your city council or fighting for a national green new deal, um, you know, joining your local labor union if you’re not in a union, you know, and, um, uh, trying to shift labor unions and their mentality because, uh, that, that’s one of still the most important kind of forms of popular power is through, um, labor unions.
Ashley Dawson: (01:36:25)
And we keep losing there, and the labor union leadership is on the side of fossil capitalism at the moment. Um, there are amazing unions like the nurses union that have been really trailblazing and shifting away from fossil capitalism, but the sector as a whole could do much better. Um, so yeah, there, there’s so many different kinds of struggles that one can engage in. And so I think figuring out where to plug in and being aware that there are a lot of movements right now that are bubbling up, um, and that you just need to find a way to connect and get in motion and that the, the feeling of hope and of capacity as an individual and, um, as you know, a popular force against climate destruction and fossil capitalism comes from that engaging in movement and solidarity. I think that’s important to keep in mind and to, to engage in.
Ashley Dawson: (01:37:17)
So that’s, that’s what I was saying, just to, you know, make those kinds of connections and figure out how to get involved is really key. I think it’s great that you’re emphasizing that many of the solutions are individual driven right they are solo actions as opposed to collective actions. That’s the way capitalism functions and yeah, it’s not going gonna do it and it just, that’s part of the problem that we end up feeling isolated and helpless as a result, you know, so know it’s great that you talked about really reimagining better, better futures, right? Not the electric cars, but public transportation. And there’s a lot, there’s a lot more we could talk about. You know, like, so when you talk about veganism, you need to talk about industrial agriculture and agroecology and peasants and land redistribution. I mean, you know, we could keep going maybe if we walk around and we can talk about some of these other kinds of issues.
Ashley Dawson: (01:38:09)
But yeah, yeah, yeah. We took so much of your time. No, my pleasure. the one that, the um, interview I did with Verso, I walked around downtown a lot, which was fun because we started at the ferry terminal and we walked past the new doors, which they put up on the 1 train and so I was able to talk about, yeah, so we saw the doors that are reinforced for flood surge and then you walk 50 feet north and there are these grates that lead into the subway right next to like one whatever Wall Street and so like you can to flood surge. Yeah, it was really amazing. And just walking around, one could narrate, you know, the kinds of contradictions in the infrastructure and resiliency building efforts. Then they were so clear. Um, but we didn’t go, we didn’t go on on the ferry and that we should rather fun. I have a lot more to say about the New York harbor. Okay. Yeah. Since we’re talking about it’s relevant. Yeah. We could go to the, um, the onion, um, uh, that high tech waste treatment facility. Um, uh, in northern Brooklyn.